Muhammad Haque London “democracy deficit and poverty-creation, deprivation by elected non-democratic agencies” Commentary: Tower Hamlets [Part 5]

1150 [1110] [1105] Hrs GMT London Tuesday 10 May 2011. © Muhammad Haque London “democracy deficit and poverty-creation, deprivation by elected non-democratic agencies” Commentary:
Tower Hamlets [Part 5] <1150 [1110] [1105] Hrs GMT London Tuesday 10 May 2011. © Muhammad Haque London “democracy deficit and poverty-creation, deprivation by elected non-democratic agencies” Commentary:
Tower Hamlets [Part 5]
Returns to ‘viewing’ the EXTRAORDINARY footage called “Undercover Boss’ featuring [Ooops! ‘starring’ none other than the smug] “Dr” Kevan Collins [ the ‘chief executive’ himself].
It bears reiterating the fact that “Dr” Kevan Collins mounted that propaganda item as part of his service to the controlling forces in the State who needed compliance from areas like Tower Hamlets in the pogramme of cuts. But did “Dr” Kevan Collins behave like a clued up publicly paid servant of the people or did he behave like a useful stooge peddling the agenda of those who have been bent on depriving the already deprived?
To illustrate this point, I shall focus on one of the fan club which accompanied “Dr” Collins on the TV screens on 22 July 2010 when Channel 4 gave them that propaganda outing!

As I do so, I draw the attention of all concerned to an utterance of central significance that “Dr” Collins made in that exhibition.

And I ask “Dr” Kevan Collins this: Did you know IN ADVANCE of the fact the characters that appeared along with you on the final show as broadcast by Channel 4?

Did you meet one [or more] of those before the planned broadcast and did you discuss the broadcast with any of them at that stage or at any stage ahead of the broadcast in July 2010?

Did you check the level of honesty, reliability, integrity, objectively defined and interpreted efficiency and competence AS DEMONSTRABLE ON THE RECORD AND BY THE RECORD of those who took part on film with you in that broadcast item?

Did you discuss with Isabella the opportunity that you were getting or being given by Channel 4?

Did you consult Isabella Freeman ion the legal the constitutional [inclduing financial liablitiesd] and the democratic advisability of your participation in that kind of programme?

Did you ‘sound out’ any of your ‘valued chums’ in or on the periphery of ‘Whitehall”?

[To be continued]
br>Returns to ‘viewing’ the EXTRAORDINARY footage called “Undercover Boss’ featuring [Ooops! ‘starring’ none other than the smug] “Dr” Kevan Collins [ the ‘chief executive’ himself].
It bears reiterating the fact that “Dr” Kevan Collins mounted that propaganda item as part of his service to the controlling forces in the State who needed compliance from areas like Tower Hamlets in the pogramme of cuts. But did “Dr” Kevan Collins behave like a clued up publicly paid servant of the people or did he behave like a useful stooge peddling the agenda of those who have been bent on depriving the already deprived?
To illustrate this point, I shall focus on one of the fan club which accompanied “Dr” Collins on the TV screens on 22 July 2010 when Channel 4 gave them that propaganda outing!

As I do so, I draw the attention of all concerned to an utterance of central significance that “Dr” Collins made in that exhibition.

And I ask “Dr” Kevan Collins this: Did you know IN ADVANCE of the fact the characters that appeared along with you on the final show as broadcast by Channel 4?

Did you meet one [or more] of those before the planned broadcast and did you discuss the broadcast with any of them at that stage or at any stage ahead of the broadcast in July 2010?

Did you check the level of honesty, reliability, integrity, objectively defined and interpreted efficiency and competence AS DEMONSTRABLE ON THE RECORD AND BY THE RECORD of those who took part on film with you in that broadcast item?

Did you discuss with Isabella the opportunity that you were getting or being given by Channel 4?

Did you consult Isabella Freeman ion the legal the constitutional [inclduing financial liablitiesd] and the democratic advisability of your participation in that kind of programme?

Did you ‘sound out’ any of your ‘valued chums’ in or on the periphery of ‘Whitehall”?

[To be continued]